Improving Student Learning Outcomes Using Active Learning Methods in Learning Moral Creeds at MAS Al-Wasliyah 26 Tinokkah Sipispis District Serdang Bedagai Regency

Authors

  • Rina Ihwani Saragih Prodi Pendidikan Agama Islam, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66867/as.v1i1.7

Keywords:

Active Learning;, Moral theology, MAS Al-Washliyah 26 Tinokkoh

Abstract

Effective learning depends on methods, and not all learning methods are suitable for all fields, especially moral beliefs which talk about something abstract. This research aims to find out how efficient the implementation of the active learning method is in improving student learning outcomes in learning moral beliefs in class. This research is field research by taking data sources from students, moral aqidah teachers, school principals and implementing active learning methods in improving the learning outcomes of class X MAS Al-Wasliyah 26 Tinokkah students as well as documentation. The data collection methods used are observation, interviews, documentation and questionnaires. The data analysis method used is descriptive analytic. From the research results, it was concluded that the implementation of active learning methods influenced the learning intensity of class X students at MAS Al-Wasliyah 26 Tinokkah. With interesting learning methods, students become more interactive and easily understand related material, moral beliefs. The teacher's efforts to improve the learning outcomes of moral beliefs in class

References

A.M, S. (2010). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar,. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

AM, S. (2018). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar,. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Anam, M. F. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif Pada Mata Pelajaran Fiqih Di Kelas V Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri 3 Banyumas. IAIN Purwokerto, Diss. Skripsi.

Daradjat, Z. (1995). Motorik Khusus Pengajaran Agama Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Dimyanti, M. (1999). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Hariyanto, W. d. (2012). Pembelajaran Aktif Teori dan Asesmen. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

HM, A. R. (1995). Pengelolaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta,.

Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik Dan Kontekstual Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia IndonesiaGhalia Indonesia.

Mohamad, H. B. (20112011). Dengan Pendakan PAILKEM. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Mulyas, E. (2010). Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Potre, B. d. (2000). Quantum Teaching. Bandung: Kaifa.

Purwanto, N. (1995). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rohmah, N. (2012). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Teras.

Sagal, S. (2009). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Samadhi, A. (2009). Pembelajaran Aktif (Active Learning). Jakarta: Teaching Improvement Worshop, Enginering Education Development Project.

Sanaky, H. A. (2003). Paradigma Pendidikan Islam Membangun Masyarakat Madani Indonesia, . Yogyakarta: Safria Insania Press.

Sanjaya, W. (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Shadily, J. M. (tt). Kamus Inggris Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Silberman, M. (2009). Active Learning: 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Bandung: Nusamedia.

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Sudjana, N. (1989). Dasar-Dasar PBM. Bandung: CV, Sinar Baru.

Syah, M. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan baru. Bandung : PT. Remaja Kaya.

Zayapragassarazan, M. Z. (2012). Active Learning Methods. NTTC Bulletin, Vol. 19, No. 1.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-24

How to Cite

Saragih, R. I. (2023). Improving Student Learning Outcomes Using Active Learning Methods in Learning Moral Creeds at MAS Al-Wasliyah 26 Tinokkah Sipispis District Serdang Bedagai Regency. As-Salam: Journal Islamic Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.66867/as.v1i1.7