Patterns of Religious Behavior and Social Interaction: The Impact of Creed Polarization in Sumber Karya Subdistrict, East Binjai
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66867/as.v2i1.46Keywords:
Creed polarization, Social interaction, Religious Behavior, East BinjaiAbstract
The polarization of creeds has become a significant phenomenon in the religious life of modern society. This article investigates the impact of creed polarization on religious behavior patterns, social interactions and social harmony in Sumber Karya Subdistrict, East Binjai. Qualitative research methods with a field study approach were used to collect data through in-depth interviews and content analysis. The research results show that creed polarization influences variations in people's religious understanding and practices. Tensions between religious communities also arise as a result of these differences in understanding. Social media plays an important role in disseminating religious information, but is also vulnerable to the spread of polarizing content. The implications of creed polarization include a decline in the quality of religious discussion and changes in patterns of religious behavior. Recommendations are put forward to overcome the polarization of the Aqidah, including the promotion of inclusive religious dialogue and a deeper understanding of religious differences. It is hoped that these steps can strengthen social harmony and harmony between religious communities in society.
References
Agustino, L., & Manan, F. (2022). Kajian polarisasi dan kerukunan umat beragama di provinsi jawa barat. Laporan Penelitian.
Azwar, W., & Muliono, M. (2022). The Multifaced Politics: A Study on Polarization of Political Behavior of Tarekat Community in West Sumatera, Indonesia. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 60(2), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2022.602.315-346
Buckley, D. T., Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2023). Is religion the opiate of the digital masses? Religious authority, social media, and protest. Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 682–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1971279
Claassen, R. L., Djupe, P. A., Lewis, A. R., & Neiheisel, J. R. (2021). Which Party Represents My Group? The Group Foundations of Partisan Choice and Polarization. Political Behavior, 43(2), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09565-6
Fakhruddin, A., Rindu Fajar Islamy, M., Romli, U., & Eka Subakti, G. (2023). RELIGIOUS EDUCATION, DIVERSITY, AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: A Case Study of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Lab School in Building a Culture of Tolerance and Interreligious Dialogue. Religió Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 13(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v13i1.2182
Hanipudin, Sarno, Subki, T., & Mulat, T. (2023). Menguatkan Akidah Dan Kualitas Hidup Melalui Pembinaan Pemahaman Agama Islam Dalam Kegiatan Muharoman Di Masjid Al-Hidayah Kujangsari. In Welfare: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (Vol. 1, Issue 4).
Harmiyaty, S. (2024). Wawancara Warga.
Hidayat, Z., Hasan Matsum, & Azhari Akmal Tarigan. (2023). GEN-Z MUSLIMS, SOCIAL MEDIA AND FORMLESS-SPIRITUAL: An Explorative Study of Mosque Youth in Medan City. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, 17(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsa.2023.171-02
Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
Laksana, B. K. C., & Wood, B. E. (2019). Navigating religious diversity: exploring young people’s lived religious citizenship in Indonesia. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(6), 807–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2018.1545998
Lukens-Bull, R., & Woodward, M. (2021). Variation of Muslim Practice in Indonesia. In Handbook of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Lives (pp. 619–640). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32626-5_78
Majid, A. (2024). Wawancara Pendakwah.
Majid, A., & Amirulkamar, S. (2023). Identity Politics Approaching the 2024 Election through Social Media Through Sociology of Religion Perspective. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 10(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v10i3.18088
Perry, S. L. (2022). American Religion in the Era of Increasing Polarization. Annual Review of Sociology, 48(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-114239
Ridder, H.-G. (2024). Review of Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook 3 rd Edition, by M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, & J. Saldaña. Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 28(4), 485–487.
Rubianto. (2024). Wawancara Kepala Kelurahan.
Takdir, M., Mushthafa, M., & AS, R. (2021). The Dynamics of Religious Conflict in Indonesia: Contestation and Resolution of Religious Conflicts in The New Order Age. Al-Adyan: Journal of Religious Studies, 2(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.15548/al-adyan.v2i2.3184
Talisse, R. B. (2024). Depolarization Without Reconciliation.
Taufiq, F., & Alkholid, A. M. (2021). Peran Kementerian Agama dalam mempromosikan moderasi beragama di era digital. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 41(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.21580/jid.v41.2.9364
Vásquez, M. (2008). Studying Religion in Motion: A Networks Approach. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 20(2), 151–184. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006808X283570
West, E. A., & Iyengar, S. (2022). Partisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization. Political Behavior, 44(2), 807–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09637-y
Zúñiga, X., Naagda, B. (Ratnesh) A., & Sevig, T. D. (2002). Intergroup Dialogues: An Educational Model for Cultivating Engagement Across Differences. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/713845248
